Thursday, July 26, 2012

"Mandated RFID Chips: Fact or Fiction?"

Last week we posted an alarming blog regarding RFID chip implants under Obamacare. We were overwhelmed by the response. Understandably, many of you were concerned and wanted more details. This week we will do our best to supply them.

Please keep in mind: These bills are complicated, vague and extremely lengthy (well over 2000 pages each). Both bills, HR 4872- The Reconciliation Act of 2010 and HR 3962- The Affordable Healthcare For America Act, have sections that deal with a National Medical Device Registry and implantable devices. Neither bill is technically a part of HR 3590, the bill known as "Obamacare". However, HR 4872 does contain the infamous Section 2521, seemingly 'cut & pasted' from the original bill known as "Obamacare", the unpassed HR 3200. To keep things as simple as possible, we will assume you have done your homework and printed out the following: HR 4872; Section 2521; Subtitle C-National Medical Device Registry-pg.1013 (www.housedocs.house.gov/rules/hr4872/111_hr4872_reported.pdf). The entire section must be read to make sense of it. Please take the time to do that before you continue. HR 3962, Section 2571, Section C begins on page 1501 and  can be obtained by going to:   www.housedocs.house.gov/rules/hr3962/111_hr3962_reported.pdf.

How did we come up with a "March 2013" implementation?

HR 4872, pg.1019; lines 4-12: "Effective date.- The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall establish and begin implementation of the registry under section 519(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as added by paragraph (1), by not later than the date that is 36 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, without regard to whether or not final regulations to establish and operate the registry have been promulgated by such date." Exact same wording is found on page 1508, beginning on line 17 in HR 3962.

  • This bill was signed into law on 3/29/2010
  • 36 months later = March 2013
For those of you unwilling to do the detective work required, this bill creates a National Medical Device Registry. The stated purpose of the Registry is to collect safety data on post-market medical devices: "a class III"; or "a class II device that is implantable, life supporting or life-sustaining" (HR 4872, pg.1014, lines 15-17; similar language is found in HR 3962, pg.1502, lines 16-17), and to put the safety data into a publicly accessible electronic database..."the term 'data' refers to information respecting a device described in paragraph (1), including claims data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary." (HR 4872, pg. 1017, line 3-9; HR 3962, pg. 1505, line 13-18).

The big question is: What exactly is "a class II device that is implantable, life supporting or life-sustaining? The innocuous definition is "pacemakers" and the like. If that's all they mean, then they will be tracking only devices and not patients. No problem. But the way these bills are written leaves another door open.

In 2004, the FDA approved "an implantable radiofrequency transponder system for patient identification and health information. A device intended to enable access to secure patient identification and corresponding health information. This system may include a passive implanted transponder, inserter, and scanner. The implanted transponder is used only to store a unique electronic identification code which is read by the scanner. The identification code is used to access patient identity and corresponding health information stored in a database." (www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance). The FDA goes on to say, "This guidance is issued in conjunction with a Federal Register notice announcing the classification (class II) of implantable radiofrequency transponder system for patient identification and health information."

Okay, back to the question of the day: Are the bills (HR 4872 & HR 3962) referring to pacemakers or RFID chips? There is a huge difference. One definition means they are collecting data about the device. The other means they are retrieving data accessible by the device. One is relatively harmless, while the other is an invasion of government into our private lives. We lay down our Christian (living-in-the-Last Days-bias) worldview with difficulty and do our best to read the bills as they are written. Verdict? You be the judge. Take the time to read them for yourselves. And then ask:
  • Why remove the National Medical Device Registry from Obamacare when it came under scrutiny?
  • Why not simply change the language of the bill (i.e. add words like: class II device NOT to include an implantable radiofrequency transponder for data collection)?
  • Why did they feel it necessary to slip the Registry section into two separate bills and then pass them without fanfare, as is, despite the public's misgivings?
And while you're at it, read the February 2, 2012 post, "Power Grab Alert!" from our Archives for another example of a vague, but frightening bill.

Words to the Wise: "Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves. Therefore, be wise as serpents and harmless as doves." (Matthew 10:16)

News:
  • Reuters: Russia warns Syria against using chemical weapons.  
  • Debka Files: Foreign forces pile up on Syrian borders in possible attempt to bring regime change. h
  • CNSnews: Iran pledges to deploy warships in the Atlantic. 
  • Express: Greece to run out of money by August 20th. 
  • CNN: Dem.Sen.Diane Feinstein walks back W.H. Natl.Security leaks remark. 
  • NBC News:  British hotel replaces Bibles with "Fifty Shades of Grey".  
  • Fox News: Protest over California police shooting spark riots in Anaheim 

                                             

8 comments:

  1. This news is creepy. Microchips in our skin are just plain weird. Its scary to know that if this is a possibility, there could be other chips that they could insert in our skin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i for one will not allow anything implanted in my body with or with out my consent this is seemingly like the mark of the beast mentioned in the book of revelations,

      and if this implant becomes a mandatory thing and those who refuse get punished then i say bring on the pain my soul is more important than my physical being yes im a christian im proud to admit i was raised as such and for anyone to persectue me because of such i do forgive you because you were either raised differently or choose the latter with this being said i will stand by my words no matter what i stand behind my beliefs and convictions. so no way will i accept anything such as an implant or anything against my beliefs

      Delete
  2. It's a step. That is the strategy employed by the enemy of your soul. More "subtil" than any other creature, he patiently takes small steps. First create the registry and clear the hurdles out of the way. Later, for the sake of the children, there will be a public outcry that kids must be chipped for their own protection. Why RFID? As soon as a child goes missing, the satellites can help the anxious parent locate him. Sounds great, but we know it's a step. I encourage my kids not to let anyone stamp their hand at a fair. Not because the guy at the entrance is the AntiChrist, but because they need to learn to stand up and say "No" now on the simple things.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i for one will not allow anything implanted in my body with or with out my consent this is seemingly like the mark of the beast mentioned in the book of revelations,

      and if this implant becomes a mandatory thing and those who refuse get punished then i say bring on the pain my soul is more important than my physical being yes im a christian im proud to admit i was raised as such and for anyone to persectue me because of such i do forgive you because you were either raised differently or choose the latter with this being said i will stand by my words no matter what i stand behind my beliefs and convictions. so no way will i accept anything such as an implant or anything against my beliefs

      Delete
  3. Neither of these drafts were actually passed, from what I've seen. I've tried to read through the actual passed form on Obamacare and so far I haven't seen anything of the sort mentioned. However, I am still reading and will reread it again to make sure. If it is mentioned, it's not as easily found as it is listed in the above mentioned drafts.

    ReplyDelete

  4. God's Power is also WITHIN YOU!

    It's so sad that Americans only have almost two months to decide. As a Christian this is one of the signs that I have read in Revelation based on personal point of view this is something that we should not fear about, this is something that we need to prepare for. Others may not believe it, only a few definitely, atheist probably. We should listen to what God says in the Bible, He owns the very breath we take and He will not allow it to suffer in hell and be a slave. With the microchip we will be robots, slaves, obey what they command becasue we don't want to starve and feel the pain in our body. We should take control right now of our lives, decide what's the best for us and our family.
    WE ARE HUMAN NOT ROBOTS OR SLAVES.

    Genesis 2:7 NIV
    The LORD God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.

    The very basic proof of our soul/spirit is eternal is that when someone hits you, you get hurt but if you're already dead eventhough someone struck your body several times with a knife, the spirit is apart from it already, there's no pain. it's the spirit that feels and it is eternal. I have seen miracles happened right before my eyes sick people being healed by prayer and I, myself, was healed for 21 days of bleeding after a miscarriage because of God's power through prayer.

    Matthew 10:28 NIV
    Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell.

    I receive a vision that God will redeem and take good care of those who trust Him and those who will not receive the microchip/mark on the forehead will still live, will not be hungry. And it will be known to mankind before March 2013. To God be the Glory Forever, not with microchip or whatsoever. The Bible says: Repent and you will experience peace of mind and power.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Rev 13 And he causeth all both small and great rich and poor free and bond to receive a mark in their right hand or in their foreheads:
    17 And that no man might buy or sell save he that had the mark or the name of the beast or the number of his name.
    18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

    666= chi xi stigma in Greek- stigma= to stick, to prick, to punch into. Mark in Greek is Charagma- meaning a mark incised for recognition of ownership. Now, look up EW Kenyon's the Blood Covenant, and know why Satan has to do this- God people are sealed in the forehead by the Holy Spirit, that is God's mark and the demons recognize it- see Rev 9 on the scorpion demon creatures. and see Acts, when the 7 sorcerers use Christ's name as a magical word and the demons recognize that they are not marked of God, and they beat thenm up. 2 Cor 1:22, Eph 1:13, Eph 4:30, 2 Tim 2:19 and Rev 9:4 all tell us about God sealing us. Satan wants to have his mimicry. He always takes God's holy things and twists them around to suit himself.
    Also, the forehead OR the right hand. Our government spent $1.5 million to find out the two places with the most frequent temperature change are the forehead and the back of the hand, this is important why? That is how the lithium battery is charged. Frequent temp change. Also, Rev 16 is the LAST DAY, also known as the DAY OF THE LORD. also known as the day of wrath. Those who have the mark will have a noiusone, singular sore- on the mark- the theory from the makers is that the tube will be broken by God, (noisome) and the lithium then causes a sore, and in experiments this has happened.

    ReplyDelete

Please let us know what you think...